International Journal of Automation, Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning https://researchlakejournals.com/index.php/AAIML <p>The <strong>International Journal of Automation, Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning</strong> (IJAAIML) provides a forum for researchers and practitioners from the fields of artificial intelligence landscape – tools, AI Chatbots, techniques and platforms, machine learning algorithms – supervised, unsupervised, ensemble&nbsp; techniques, application of neural networks &nbsp;and deep neural networks, application of deep learning to computer vision and natural language processing, robotic automation and newly developed cross-disciplinary studies that exhibit intelligent autonomous behavioral characteristics. The journal delivers the cutting-edge research on techniques, technologies and algorithms and promotes development in emerging disciplines that support robotic automation, artificial intelligence and machine learning. The journal offers the access to opportunities to exploration and implementation of systems from the basis of concepts, theories, patterns and procedures that exhibit properties, phenomena, or abilities of any man or machine that have substantive impact to real world problems.</p> <p>This journal recognizes that artificial intelligence (AI) has come a long way from fuzzy logic to feedback mechanism in intelligent systems to John McCarthy’s tireless efforts that promotes continued research on this subject. This journal positions to seize the moment of change and innovation in strategic transformation that the subject topics impact how human live, interact, study and work. This journal opens to policy making and standards formation from government and regulatory agency, business organization and industry associations, for instance, from the perspective how they deploy and integrate research and development in subject advancements into business process, corporate governance, and large-scale compliance and regulatory initiatives. Proof of concepts and pilots of innovation can be incorporated as case studies, product demo or service offerings in any significant stage of the maturity or lifecycle. The journal encourages the researchers and practitioners to take part and join the community today, rather than wait for perfection of their product or services.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <p>Topics of interest include but are not limited to, the following</p> <ul> <li class="show">AI Chatbots</li> <li class="show">Robotics</li> <li class="show">Large Language Models (LLMs)</li> <li class="show">Generative AI (Gen AI)</li> <li class="show">Generative AI Applications</li> <li class="show">Artificial Intelligence for Business</li> <li class="show">Human-AI Collaboration</li> <li class="show">AI-driven Decision Making</li> <li class="show">Automation Technologies</li> <li class="show">Machine learning techniques</li> <li class="show">Deep learning techniques</li> <li class="show">Predictive Analytics</li> <li class="show">Expert systems</li> <li class="show">Big data and data mining</li> <li class="show">Fuzzy pattern recognition</li> <li class="show">Fuzzy system applications in robotics</li> <li class="show">Fuzzy neural systems, neuro-fuzzy systems</li> <li class="show">Adaptive autonomous robots</li> <li class="show">Natural language processing</li> <li class="show">Neural networks</li> <li class="show">Parallel processing</li> <li class="show">Pattern recognition</li> <li class="show">Computational intelligence</li> <li class="show">Computational linguistics</li> <li class="show">Computer vision</li> <li class="show">Human machine interaction</li> <li class="show">Neuro-computing</li> <li class="show">Soft computing and fuzzy inference</li> <li class="show">Speech analysis and recognition</li> <li class="show">Stochastic optimization</li> </ul> en-US <p>Copyright © by the authors; licensee Research Lake International Inc., Canada. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) (http://creative-commons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).</p> editor.ijaaiml@researchlakejournals.com (Anke Berger) Anke.Berger@researchlakejournals.com (Anke Berger) Fri, 26 Dec 2025 02:46:23 -0600 OJS 3.1.2.1 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Breaking Down Barriers: How Conversational AI Makes Smart Homes Accessible to All https://researchlakejournals.com/index.php/AAIML/article/view/547 <p><strong>Objective: </strong>Smart home technology promises convenience and independence, yet it systematically excludes elderly users, people with disabilities and non-technical populations due to rigid command syntax, platform fragmentation and privacy concerns. We introduce SmartHomeHarmonizer, an edge-based conversational framework that enables natural language interaction across heterogeneous voice platforms while preserving user privacy.</p> <p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our framework combines a progressive neural architecture compression pipeline, a dynamic cross-platform intent mapping protocol and a federated accent-adaptation mechanism. These innovations reduce model size from 438 MB to 28.7 MB with negligible accuracy loss, unify Alexa, Google Assistant, HomeKit and Matter ecosystems through semantic bridging (a technique that maps natural language intents to platform-specific APIs using ontological relationships), and continuously adapt to user accents on-device using differential privacy. We evaluate SmartHomeHarmonizer in three six-month deployments (assisted living facilities N=142, disability services N=48 and affordable housing N=89), using Bonferroni-corrected statistical analysis to compare against existing edge and cloud assistants.</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong>SmartHomeHarmonizer achieves 89.3% intent recognition accuracy, reduces task completion time by 68.7% (p&lt;0.001, Cohen's d=1.82) and lowers end-to-end latency to 584 ms, outperforming state-of-the-art edge solutions. Adoption reached 82% among elderly users, while caregiver assistance requests dropped by 54%. Federated learning improved recognition accuracy for non-native speakers from 71.3% to 91.6% over six months without compromising privacy. The system operates at 3.1 W idle power consumption, representing a 73% reduction compared to commercial alternatives.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results demonstrate that sophisticated conversational AI can run efficiently on low-cost hardware (&lt;US$55) and significantly improve accessibility. By releasing the source code, datasets, trained models, and deployment infrastructure, SmartHomeHarmonizer provides a replicable foundation for inclusive smart-home research.</p> Praveen Chinnusamy Copyright (c) 2025 Praveen Chinnusamy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 https://researchlakejournals.com/index.php/AAIML/article/view/547 Wed, 15 Oct 2025 00:00:00 -0500 Role of Quality Assurance in DevOps: Bridging the Gap Between Development and Operations https://researchlakejournals.com/index.php/AAIML/article/view/563 <p>The way we incorporate Quality Assurance (QA) into DevOps has come a long way. It is no longer just a step that happens after development; now, it is a continuous, smart process that flows throughout the entire software delivery lifecycle. This study explores how blending AI and machine learning techniques with modern QA practices can make a real difference, drawing on data from various production environments. The results are impressive: we found that defect density dropped by as much as 64.2%, the average time to repair issues fell by 42.1%, automated test coverage increased by 39.1%, and deployment success rates went up by 16.6%. By employing model-driven strategies like predicting build failures with XGBoost, generating intelligent test cases using CodeT5, and detecting anomalies through Isolation Forest, our integrated framework is able to spot risks early, enhance test execution, and speed up the release process. When we compared these outcomes to our benchmarks before the integration, it became clear that AI-enhanced QA not only reduces production defects and rollback incidents, but it also helps eliminate the bottlenecks typical of traditional QA methods. These study revealed the game-changing potential of self-healing, predictive QA systems for handling scalable, high-frequency release cycles. Nevertheless, it is important to note some trade-offs, such as the added complexity of maintaining test suites and the impact on pipeline execution time.</p> Wumi Ajayi, Idowu Olugbenga Adewumi, Nelson Ayibawanemi John Copyright (c) 2025 Wumi Ajayi, Idowu Olugbenga Adewumi, Nelson Ayibawanemi John https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 https://researchlakejournals.com/index.php/AAIML/article/view/563 Mon, 10 Nov 2025 00:00:00 -0600 A Hybrid Cloud-Based AI Framework for Real-Time Insurance Fraud Detection Using Snowflake and Cortex AI https://researchlakejournals.com/index.php/AAIML/article/view/564 <p>Insurance fraud remains one of the most pervasive challenges in the financial sector, demanding scalable and explainable AI-driven solutions. This study presents an integrated framework that combines snowflake’s cloud-native data warehouse and ML Ops architecture with cortex AI’s machine-learning environment to enable real-time detection of fraudulent insurance claims. The proposed system unifies supervised algorithms (XGBoost, logistic regression) and unsupervised techniques (isolation forest, LOF) to balance high-accuracy classification with anomaly discovery. Experimental evaluation on a dataset exceeding one million claims achieved 88% accuracy and an F1-score of 0.87, confirming the framework’s robustness and scalability. A theoretical analysis explains the superior performance of supervised models due to the bias–variance balance and label-driven optimization, while exploratory deep-learning benchmarks (CNNs, LSTMs) illustrate potential gains in sequential fraud pattern detection. The inclusion of Snowflake’s model registry, lineage tracking, and multi-cloud integration ensures compliance and operational transparency. Future extensions involving autoencoders, GANs, and federated learning are proposed to advance adaptive, cross-institutional fraud analytics. Overall, the hybrid snowflake–cortex AI architecture represents a reproducible, enterprise-ready solution for modernizing fraud detection with transparency, efficiency, and regulatory alignment.</p> Sreenivasarao Amirineni Copyright (c) 2025 Sreenivasarao Amirineni https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 https://researchlakejournals.com/index.php/AAIML/article/view/564 Tue, 18 Nov 2025 00:00:00 -0600 From Reactive BI to Agentic AI: The Rise of Domain Specific Autonomous Insight Systems in Enterprise Analytics https://researchlakejournals.com/index.php/AAIML/article/view/559 <p>Enterprises need descriptive and diagnostic insight engines that think ahead of users, not after them. This paper presents a research framework for agentic analytics that unifies four ideas into a single, verifiable system. First, ontology aligned grounding maps business language to concrete data assets and permitted joins. Second, a scaffolded tool layer executes plans safely across query engines, catalogs, code runners, and visualization services while exposing traces for audit. Third, a multi-turn hypothesis engine treats explanations as first-class objects that are generated, tested against data, revised, and ranked. Fourth, a dual judge mechanism fuses an LLM critic with a gold data layer that serves as the final arbiter of numerical claims and structural correctness. We specify rubric signals for each stage and show how those signals become rewards for reinforcement learning of both single agents and coordinated teams. The result is a pathway from natural language intent to governed, reproducible descriptive analytics that improve over time.</p> Praveen Koushik Satyanarayana Copyright (c) 2025 Praveen Koushik Satyanarayana https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 https://researchlakejournals.com/index.php/AAIML/article/view/559 Wed, 19 Nov 2025 04:37:12 -0600 Artificial Intelligence and Control Charts: A Big Problem https://researchlakejournals.com/index.php/AAIML/article/view/592 <p>We use the data of some published papers to compare those authors findings with ours. From the analysis we get different results: the cause is that the authors use the probability limits of the PI (Probability Interval) as they were the confidence limits (control limits of the control charts, CCs). The control limits in the Shewhart CCs are based on the normal distribution Central Limit Theorem (CLT) and are not valid for non-normal distributed data: consequently, the decisions about the “In Control” (IC) and “Out of Control” (OOC) states of the process are wrong. The control limits of the CCs are wrongly computed, due to unsound knowledge of the fundamental concept of confidence interval. Minitab and other software e (e.g. JMP, SAS) use the “T charts”, claimed to be a good method for dealing with “rare events”, but their computed control limits of the CCs are wrong. The same happens for the confidence limits of the parameters of the distribution involved in the papers (Weibull, Inverse Weibull, Gamma, Binomial, Maxwell). We will show that the Reliability Integral Theory (RIT) is able to solve these problems and the Sequential way of dealing with data.</p> Fausto Galetto Copyright (c) 2025 Fausto Galetto https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 https://researchlakejournals.com/index.php/AAIML/article/view/592 Wed, 17 Dec 2025 04:12:01 -0600