Sequentially Administered WAIS-IV Short Forms in Traumatic Brain Injury: Screening for Subnormal IQ and Intellectual Deterioration

  • Samuel Gontkovsky Department of Psychology, Twin Valley Behavioral Healthcare, Columbus, Ohio, USA
  • David Kreiner Professor, Department of Psychological Science, School of Nutrition, Kinesiology, and Psychological Science, University of Central Missouri, USA
Keywords: WAIS-IV, intelligence, classification accuracy, short form, TBI

Abstract

This investigation examines the utility of Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition short form (SF) IQs and abbreviated General Ability Indexes (GAIs) to discriminate normal from subnormal intellectual functioning and detect possible cognitive deterioration. Participants were 60 individuals with traumatic brain injury. Following the standard order of subtest administration and depending on performance, assessment may be terminated after two, three, four, or five subtests. Classification accuracy statistics indicated that all SF predictions exceeded the subnormal base rate (i.e., IQ = 35%; GAI = 28%), with hit rates from .83 to .93. Two-subtest SFs for the IQ and estimated GAI were not recommended. A three-subtest SF prediction exceeded the base rate for intellectual deterioration (BR = 45%, HR = .80). A four-subtest SF was recommended for estimating FSIQs; three- and four-subtest SFs were good predictors of the GAI, and a three-subtest SF was useful for identifying intellectual deterioration.

Published
2022-02-16